INSEMA Trial Results: Can Axillary Surgery Be Omitted for Patients with Node Negative Invasive Breast Cancer?
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
- Reimer et al. (NEJM, 2024) report on whether complete omission of axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery is noninferior to more invasive options
METHODS:
- Prospective, multicentered, randomized, noninferiority trial
- INSEMA (Intergroup-Sentinel-Mamma)
- Comparison of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy versus no axillary surgery
- 142 sites in Germany | 9 sites in Austria
- Participants
- Patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer | Staged as T1 or T2 (tumor size ≤5 cm) | Scheduled to undergo breast-conserving surgery
- Interventions
- Surgery omission group: treatment without axillary surgery
- Surgery group: sentinel-lymph-node biopsy
- Further randomization for those in this group with pathological sentinel-node–positive status to dissection or no dissection
- Results of second randomization are not reported here
- Study design
- Analyses were conducted per-protocol
- Needed for noninferiority
- 5-year invasive disease–free survival rate ≥85% AND
- Upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the hazard ratio (HR) for invasive disease or death had to be below 1.271
- Primary outcome
- Invasive disease-free survival
RESULTS:
- Surgery omission group: 962 patients | Surgery group: 3896 patients
- Median follow-up: 73.6 months
- Surgery omission was noninferior to surgery for estimated 5-year invasive disease–free survival
- Surgery omission: 91.9% (95% CI, 89.9 to 93.5) | Surgery: 91.7% (95% CI, 90.8 to 92.6)
- HR 0.91 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14)
- Estimated 5-year overall survival rate
- Surgery omission: 98.2% (95% CI, 97.1 to 98.9)
- Surgery: 96.9% (95% CI, 96.3 to 97.5)
- Subgroup analysis of tumor size resulted in larger T2 confidence intervals for 5-year invasive disease–free survival
- T2: HR 0.71 (95% CI, 0.39 to 1.32)
- T1: HR 0.95 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.20)
- Long term safety analysis favored surgery omission vs surgery group
- Lymphedema: 1.8% vs. 5.7%
- Restriction of arm or shoulder mobility: 2.0% vs. 3.5%
- Pain with arm or shoulder movement: 2.0% vs. 4.2%
CONCLUSION:
- Omitting axillary surgery for patients with clinically node-negative, T1 or T2 invasive breast cancer was noninferior to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy after a median of 6 years of follow-up
- The authors state
Our trial shows that the omission of axillary-sentinel-lymph-node biopsy does not compromise survival in patients with early-stage, cN0 breast cancer who plan to undergo primary breast-conserving surgery
This de-escalation concept may be suitable for patients 50 years of age or older who present with low-risk (grade G1 or G2), HR-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and clinical T1 tumors
Learn More – Primary Sources:
Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer — Primary Results of the INSEMA Trial
Want to share this with your colleagues?
SPECIALTY AREAS
- Alerts
- Allergy And Immunology
- Cancer Screening
- Cardiology
- Cervical Cancer Screening
- Dermatology
- Diabetes
- Endocrine
- ENT
- Evidence Matters
- General Internal Medicine
- Genetics
- Geriatrics
- GI
- GU
- Hematology
- ID
- Medical Legal
- Mental Health
- MSK
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- PcMED Connect
- PrEP for Patients
- PrEP for Physicians
- Preventive Medicine
- Pulmonary
- Rheumatology
- Vaccinations
- Women's Health
- Your Practice